Sen. Tom Young files penny sales tax bill

  • Thursday, January 23, 2014

Fact Box

To amend Section 410470, code of laws of South Carolina, 1976, relating to the education capital improvements sales and use tax, so as to allow a county that does not collect a certain amount in accommodations tax to impose the sales tax so long as no portion of the county area is subject to more than two percent total sales tax.


Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:


Section 1. Section 410470 of the 1976 Code, as added by Act 316 of 2008, is amended to read:


Section 410470. (A) The Education Capital Improvements Sales and Use Tax authorized by this article may only be imposed in counties which have collected at least seven million dollars in state accommodations taxes as imposed pursuant to Section 1236920(A) in the most recent fiscal year for which full collection figures are available. Once a county meets this threshold it thereafter remains eligible to impose this tax.


(B)(1) The Education Capital Improvements Sales and Use Tax authorized by this article also may be imposed in counties which do not meet the collection requirements of subsection (A) so long as, at any time, no portion of the county area is subject to more than two percent total sales tax.


(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if, within a county there is imposed the Education Capital Improvements Sales and Use Tax pursuant to this subsection, then no other sales tax may be imposed if the subsequent imposition causes the total sales tax to exceed two percent in any portion of the county area. This limitation applies so long as this subsection is utilized to impose the Education Capital Improvements Sales and Use tax.


(3) For purposes of this subsection, a sales tax is a tax levied pursuant to this chapter, pursuant to Chapter 37, Title 4, or pursuant to any local law enacted by the General Assembly.”


Section 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

Photos

Related Articles



S.C. Sen. Tom Young, R-Aiken, filed legislation on Jan. 15 that seeks to give the Aiken County School Board the option of asking voters if they would prefer a one-cent sales tax to raise funding for education capital improvements to paying additional property taxes.


According to Young, that option is already available to 20 other counties in South Carolina.


The option is not currently available in Aiken County because it does not collect at least $7 million in accommodations taxes.


If approved, the legislation would apply to all counties not currently collecting enough accommodations taxes, not just Aiken County.


“It amends existing state laws so that a county like Aiken can present penny sales tax options to voters,” Young said. “The only thing the school district can do right now is ask the public if they want higher property taxes. Under this option, they can introduce the penny sales tax.”


Young added that, if passed, funds from the one-cent sales tax would go toward whatever the school district identifies as its capital needs.


“My focus is on getting this legislation passed so when the school district introduces it, the public can vote on it,” he added.


Numbers show that the sales tax referendum would raise up to $20 million a year for seven years to address school facility needs. Because of that, the bill has already garnered support from other legislators and education leaders.


David Caver, the deputy superintendent for the school district, said the bill would help generate funding for maintenance improvements and for building projects in the county.


“We watch the cycle of our maintenance needs closely. We've been fortunate so far, but we really need to get started on these projects,” Caver said.


“We're maintaining, but we always need to be wary of the cycle of those needs.”


Keith Liner, an Aiken School Board member, said he is also excited about the potential passing of the bill.


“I'm pretty excited to see it in writing,” he said. “I'm just thankful for the efforts of the senators to introduce it.”


Young added that S.C. Sens. Nikki Setzler, R-Aiken, and Shane Massey, R-Edgefield, were instrumental in filing the bill which is currently awaiting a vote from the General Assembly.


Comments

Notice about comments:

North Augusta Star is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. We do not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not North Augusta Star.

If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full terms and conditions.

Upcoming Events
Poll
 Latest News
Print Ads
Latest Videos


North Augusta Star

© 2014 North Augusta Star an Evening Post Industries company. All Rights Reserved.

Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Parental Consent Form.